Ceramic On Ceramoic Hip Replacement Survivorship Study

Modern manufacturing techniques and developments have increased the strength and reliability of ceramic materials.

Ceramic on ceramoic hip replacement survivorship study.

The alumina ceramic femoral head was introduced for total hip arthroplasty approximately thirty years ago. The aim of this study was to examine the results of revision total hip replacement performed specifically to treat a fracture of a ceramic femoral head and to identify. A descriptive observational study was undertaken using data from the national joint registry njr for england wales northern ireland and the isle of man between april. Therefore a ceramic on poly replacement has the advantage of the lip and a ceramic on ceramic has the advantage of being tougher and permitting the use of a larger.

Ceramic systems have been in use since the 1970s and have undergone many technological advances over the decades. Long lasting hip replacement is the main advantage of ceramic hip replacement systems. Ceramic hip implants are among the newer types of prostheses being used for hip replacement offering greater resistance to damage and smooth movement of the joint. Many surgeons today consider them to be an improvement over traditional metal and plastic implants in which the deterioration of plastic can lead to the gradual buildup of debris.

This lip serves to lower the risk of dislocation. We are all aware of the significant change in relation to the world of metal on metal hip replacements and hip resurfacings with several devices being withdrawn from the market or greatly restricted in their prescribed application. The ceramics used in hip replacement surgery are alumina ceramic and zirconia ceramic. An x ray of the pelvic area showing a replacement hip.

This is a two phased study consisting of a clinical follow up phase and a clinical outcomes phase. Is your surgeon being paid to promote a certain type of hip. This study is intended to gather medium 0 5 years and long term 6 10 years information regarding the performance and safety of the commercially available ceramax ceramic on ceramic total hip system. It has now been over eight years since we last talked.

Ceramic on ceramic hip prostheses are an increasingly popular choice for hip replacement. Despite reports of fractures and stripe wear harder. One of its main drawbacks was the risk of implant fracture. Ceramic on metal doesn t seem to have the same durability as ceramic on ceramic based on this study.

One of the real challenges in navigating this landscape is that regrettably joint replacement devices have been one of the worst areas of payola in medicine. The alternative bearing couples such as metal on polyethylene and metal on metal are more inclined to wear and produce particulate debris. A ceramic cup can not incorporate the lip that is a standard part of a plastic cup liner.